Get the analysis you need to achieve your goals
The digital era has given rise to powerful data analytics tools. These are helping firms to make more informed decisions in an increasingly disruptive environment.
Benchmarking is one such tool. Goodman Jones’ benchmarking service compares your financial performance with a carefully selected peer group.
Our benchmarking reports allow you to:
Benchmarking takes the emotion and subjectivity out of performance measurement and strategic decision-making.
It provides crucial strategic context for your business plan, by shedding light on important issues such as:
Having this insight at your fingertips helps you to anticipate threats, make the right decisions, and ultimately improve business performance.
Benchmarking reports are also highly useful when seeking investment or acquisitions, or planning your exit. The analysis they offer can help justify your reasons for borrowing, selling up or purchasing other businesses.
Our team has developed a thorough process for benchmarking exercises. We begin by working closely with your senior team to:
We then collate and analyse economic, industry, demographic and government data from specialist reports – in collaboration with research house IBISWorld. And we combine this with the data we have on your own business to:
Finally, we present our findings in a plain-English report, written for your financial and non-financial stakeholders.
How we've helped:
The board asked Goodman Jones how they could verify that the association was offering best value to its member associations.
With Brexit looming, they also wanted to check that its UK headquarters was competitively located in terms of its cost base.
We recommended conducting an industry benchmarking study.
Benchmarking analysis looks at how an organisation is performing compared to its sector as a whole. It examines growth, revenue and costs in granular detail, giving an in-depth view of profitability in relation to the business’s peers.
By looking dispassionately at what the numbers say, benchmarking takes the emotion and ‘gut feel’ out of performance analysis.
We worked with the board to define their benchmarking objectives, so that the exercise would analyse exactly what they needed.
We selected suitable peer organisations to evaluate against, and the right metrics too analyse. The performance measures chosen for comparison were:
Looking at revenue growth would provide a barometer of the scale and popularity of the federation’s events.
Meanwhile, the profit margin analysis would indicate how
efficiently they were running these activities.
Revenue per employee was intended to show how much income is being generated for stakeholders by the contribution of the workforce. Finally, comparing their cost
structure for each £1 of revenue would shed light on how its income is being spent, and how much is being retained as profit.
With no industry reports for trade associations available from third parties, we went about gathering and analysing publicly available information, including:
We also identified the methods and assumptions that would to allow us to make detailed and accurate comparisons.
Then, having run our analysis and interpreted the results, we presented our findings in a plain-English report written for financial and non-financial stakeholders.
Our analysis highlighted the federation’s robust financial performance:
“As a non-profit organisation, we’re always focused on giving a best-value service to members.
Goodman Jones’ benchmarking analysis was designed specifically around our needs and the metrics we were most interested in.
The exercise not only underlined our robust financial performance, and the value generated for our national associations; it gave us a better feel for how we compare to our peers, and highlighted areas for deeper consideration.”
“The inescapable conclusion was that their members are getting excellent value. Our benchmarking solution demonstrated to the board and stakeholders that the organisation is competitive, efficient and has the right structure in place. As such, no corrective action was considered necessary.
With this level assurance, the board could focus on its mission to invest in the industry with renewed confidence.”